-- Download Free Speech and the Privatization of Public Space as PDF --
The privately owned parking lot near the prime minister’s constituency office asserts that protesting is prohibited. On the surface, this looks like the prime minister is impeding the constitutional rights of expression and peaceful assembly.
I’m sure he finds this all quite convenient, but a large hidden issue in this is the privatization of public space.
Can I prohibit protest in a space I own? Possibly.
Can I lament at the amount of space deemed to be public [parking lot, shopping mall] that is really privately owned? Yes.
We need to remember to assert the legitimacy of the public usefulness of space. We need to challenge the amount of space being privatized. This is a difficult task. Any suggestions?
“Political or public protesting or demonstrating, soliciting, use of loud speakers or other similar devices, pamphleteering, loitering [and] skateboarding is strictly prohibited,” states the signs, which were installed by the owners of Glenmore Landing.
via Signs banning protests by Harper’s Calgary office questioned – Calgary – CBC News.
More from my site
Stephen Elliott-Buckley
Latest posts by Stephen Elliott-Buckley (see all)
- Goodbye, Politics, Re-Spun! Hello, WePivot.net! - October 21, 2016
- Fixing the Cleveland I*****s Racist Team Name - October 19, 2016
- What the BC Premier’s Reconciliation Smells Like - October 18, 2016
Well, here’s the deal.
It’s private property.
The owner of private property can choose to restrict protest.
It’s definitely the common law. It sure sucks, but it’s the law.
Protest the law? Go for it. Just be ready to be trespassed off of the property.
sadly, it seems so.
i think this opens up a broader discussion about what kind of public space we have left and how we should be able to use it for political purposes.
Our MPs are public servants and any offices that they occupy, including constituency offices, must be open to free, unfettered public access including peaceful demonstrations. MPs should not be allowed to hide behind the rules governing private use of private property.
[This comment was from a reader who does not agree with Donald Smith and has considerably strong opinions about him. Unfortunately, many of them were tantamount to, if not clearly, libel, and as such, we cannot publish them verbatim. –Eds.]