There has been a great deal of talk in recent decades about the cycle of poverty, how it’s a vicious circle that children have difficulty getting out of.
Human chromosomes with telomeres stained fluorescent red. Copyright Nakamura et al.
It makes sense. If parents are short on economic resources, have to work multiple jobs, have little free time to nurture their children, it can impede children’s growth.
What if poverty actually harmed children physiologically, not just impeding socio-economic opportunities? Wouldn’t that then constitute a plan to ensure the poor really, really, really stay poor?
An underclass?
It wouldn’t be a eugenics plan, however, unless we actually knew that poverty stunted children physiologically and we set up greedy, self-serving, 1%-worshiping policy that kept the poor down.
It’s not like poverty can harm a child’s growth and development like cigarettes or nuclear waste.
But then I read this:
9-year-old children raised in disadvantaged circumstances show signs of damage to their DNA. From @cbcquirkshttp://t.co/GfiQFtPRb1
And it turns out that poverty, and other stressors like violence and family instability, harm chromosomes of children as young as 9 years old. Read more on the science below.
So I don’t think BC is a petri dish of poverty eugenics. After all, who knew that poverty harms the growth of our children.
But actually, now that we know, if we fail to act by continuing to ignore the creation of a provincial poverty reduction strategy and other interventions to alleviate stressors in children, wouldn’t that neglect be a casual, inadvertent eugenics plan to biologically disenfranchise those who happen to be growing up in poverty, violence or family instability. And don’t forget, the former is often a cause or an exacerbater of the latter two.
Poverty Erodes DNA in Children
Saturday, April 12, 2014
9-year-old children raised in disadvantaged circumstances show signs of damage to their DNA.
Human chromosomes with telomeres stained fluorescent red. Copyright Nakamura et al.
Growing up in socially stressful environments that include poverty, violence and unstable family relationships can affect the DNA of children as young as 9 years old. Dr. Daniel Notterman, a physician and Molecular Biologist with Pennsylvania State University and Princeton University, led a study that has showed that 9-year-old boys from socially disadvantaged households had shorter telomeres than those from relatively advantaged backgrounds. Telomeres are sequences of protective DNA at the end of chromosomes that erode with age and stress. Shorter telomeres are correlated with accelerated aging, and increased risk of disease and death. Dr. Notterman suggests that this may argue for early intervention programs for disadvantaged children, to avoid the biological risks of deprivation.
Stephen Elliott-Buckley is a husband, father, professor, speaker, consultant, former suburban Vancouver high school English and Social Studies teacher who changed careers because the BC Liberal Party has been working hard to ruin public education. He has various English and Political Science degrees and has been writing political, social and economic editorials since November 2002. Stephen is in Twitter, Miro and iTunes, and the email thing, and at his website, dgiVista.org.
April 25, 2006 COPE: A Tonic for NPA Dispossession
May 19, 2012 Quebec singer Ariane Moffat releases single against Bill 78
April 6, 2007 More "Support the Troops" Brainwashing on CanWest Global
October 29, 2004 Flipping the Osama/w.Caesar Coin
April 21, 2014 The World Economic Forum Is Now Occupy’s Mouthpiece
